M.Th. New Testament · Source syllabus

NT 01: Methodological and Critical Issues in New Testament Studies

AG

AGBS learning community

Read, question, research and revise

All programme syllabi

Methodology · NT 01

Methodological and Critical Issues in New Testament Studies

M.Th. New Testament · Source syllabus with original formative learning enrichment

Course focus from source objectives

No separate course description is supplied. The focus below is an excerpt from the source objectives, not a newly approved description.

To provide a better understanding of the milieu of New Testament studies

Course objectives

To provide a better understanding of the milieu of New Testament studies

To highlight a relevant methodology for New Testament studies

To discuss major critical issues in interpreting the New Testament in today's world

Source methods and requirements

Reproduced source instructions, not newly scheduled LMS deadlines or extra formative assessments.

TEACHING METHODS
Lectures on selected themes of methodological importance Reading relevant modern literature on important issues of NT studies Presentations of papers by the students on important topics

Original AGBS learning enrichment

Think beyond the outline.

These new exercises are formative suggestions, not changes to your official syllabus, deadlines or assessment weights. Your faculty decides which activities to use in class.

Your study record

Practice is available without signing in. Sign in first to save work to AWS; unsigned drafts exist only in page memory and disappear when you leave. Nothing is silently saved on this computer.

Use fictional or anonymised ministry cases. Do not enter another person’s counselling, medical or private family details.

My unit checklist

0 of 3 sections marked studied by you. This is self-reported learning progress.

Reflect

Pause and make a connection.

0/8000 characters

Create and collaborate

Convene a methods-and-evidence research laboratory

Choose a passage and two methods named in the outline. Build an annotated evidence map, compare the questions each method asks and revise a small research proposal after peer critique. Distinguish primary evidence, scholarly inference and contextual application.

  1. 1. Prepare
    Read the relevant source unit and record your evidence.
  2. 2. Make
    Create a draft, diagram, dialogue or teaching resource.
  3. 3. Revisit
    Invite peer feedback in class; revise and explain what changed.

Check your understanding

Which combination of methods is explicitly named in this outline?

Practice only. No marks are posted to the gradebook.